Today is a big day as we’ve having a second solar array installed – this should provide sufficient electricity to cover the remaining usage for the house, plus enough left over to charge the ZOE. The rear roof of the house is completely covered by the existing system so this one has to go on the front. That means it will be north facing so I’m prepared to have a lower than average yield. However, the predictions I’ve seen imply that it will still be economic, it will just take a little longer to pay off – perhaps 10-11 years rather than 8-10.
Last night after the scaffolding went up I cleaned the moss off the roof tiles – not necessary, but the only opportunity I’ll get to do it. I finished that this morning just before the installers (Greenday Renewables) turned up. It’s now the afternoon and so far most of the panels are up on the roof, and the inverter is in the loft, and currently all the connections into the consumer unit/fuse box are being made.
Update: It’s now the evening, the installers have gone, and I’ve finished tidying up. The weather was foul for most of the day, with almost non-stop rain from late morning, which made things harder (and a bit messier) than usual. Nonetheless the system is complete and working, although the amount of energy being generated at the end of a day when the sky is overcast is relatively small, making it harder to confirm that it is wired and operating correctly.
The inverter in the loft is fixed to a wooden upright as the prime location (the end wall nearest the consumer unit) has the inverter for the existing solar array. I made up a wooden board and that went across the upright to mount the isolators.
This time around the system includes the addition of a Wattson Solar Plus Energy Monitor. It displays total solar generation less usage, so you know how much ‘free’ electricity there is to spare (which might prompt you to switch on the dishwasher, etc.). More on Wattson in a later post – suffice to say for the next few days I’ll be switching things on and off to see the real-time effect on our usage and so work out where in particular our energy (and therefore money) is currently going.
Looking at how much electricity our solar array has generated prompted me to look at how much electricity we’ve been using over the last few years. I was able to dig out most of my energy bills back five years and used those in a similar process to graph our usage – see the chart above.
One of the first things that is obvious is that there is only data for the four quarterly bills in a year, there is no data per month never mind per week. This general point highlights how poor are the systems in place for tracking energy usage. I didn’t realise it before this exercise but our meters are only read about twice per year (typically in May and November) so there’s no real indication of how much energy you are using at any time, and the bills in between these readings are just based on estimates.
Of course the government has plans for everyone to get smart meters installed to give better tracking of energy usage. However, the start of the rollout was planned for next year and has just been delayed by a year. They won’t be fully in place before 2020 which is a long time to wait. In the meantime to address the issue of a lack of detailed information on energy usage I have started to manually record the electricity (and gas) meter readings once per week.
Anyway, back to the chart. Given the lack of data, and its questionable accuracy (since it includes estimated readings) it is dangerous to deduce too much from it. It fairly clearly and as expected shows higher electricity usage in winter months compared to the summer – presumably from more use of lighting, and perhaps more time spent indoors watching television, etc.
I would also like to conclude from it that our usage of electricity from the grid has reduced since installing solar, i.e. that the values for 2011 and 2012 are lower than previous years. However, that is not obvious, and in particular the usage for Jan/Feb 2011 is particularly high. It would probably be wishful thinking anyway, since we are often out (and hence electricity usage is low) when the sun is shining brightest. So what can be done to get more benefit from solar?
There are three key income elements to the government’s solar feed-in-tariff system:
You get paid a generation amount for each unit of electricity generated.
You get paid for each unit exported to the grid. However, since there are no smart meters in place yet this is done notionally: you get paid an export amount for exactly half of what you generate as though you exported it.
Given that the export isn’t metered, you can use the electricity you generate for whatever you want for free.
This means that there is a clear economic benefit to using as much of the electricity you generate as it is being generated, since it deemed to be exported but is actually available to use. This ignores, of course, the complex moral question of whether you should just export it anyway so as to reduce your neighbours’ carbon footprints regardless of the economic cost to yourself, and I may return to this question in a future post.
Anyway, assuming for now the aim is to get the best economic benefit from the solar array, I have been considering some ideas on how to achieve it:
We need to defer our electricity usage to the times when most electricity is being generated. This means, for example, operating the dishwasher and washing machine during the day rather than in the evening (and so using their timer functions if we are out during the day).
Use some electricity storage such as batteries. However I believe such systems are still too expensive to be economically justifiable.
Heating our water electrically to save on gas usage, i.e. operate our electrical immersion heater from solar during the day. There are some technically advanced systems for doing this such as Immersun but they are expensive and so payback would take a long time. I am currently looking into simply running the immersion heater from a timer during the summer months so it operates during daylight hours.
As well as economic benefits I am determined to reduce our family’s carbon footprint – getting the solar array and the ZOE are the key elements to this. There are also other approaches and lifestyle changes that I will be investigating; others are further along this road than I am and I recommend anyone interested to research further. I have put some starting links on the Links page, for example the excellent Earth Notes site.
I previously described the installation and setup of the solar system on the back (south facing) roof of our house. It was installed by Greenday Renewables who I highly recommend – we have had no trouble with it and it works very well.
The most important information, however, is of course how successful it has been at generating electricity. The system is a 3.7 kWp array, consisting of 10 panels each of 185 Wp (plus an inverter in the loft), where Wp indicates ‘Watts peak’. What this means is that in an ideal (‘peak’) situation the 185 Wp panels could each produce 185 Watts of electrical power, so all ten together could generate 3.7 kilowatts. Of course, they are never used in perfect conditions so an estimate is generally provided of the likely total amount of power generated for a particular system arranged at a given angle, direction and latitude. For our system this was 3333 kWh per year, where 1 kWh of energy is a kilowatt of power provided for one hour.
The size of the system was determined by the roof space – it was the largest system that could fit. It is eligible for the government feed in tariff (FIT) which applies to any domestic system up to 4 kWp. We would have gone for the full 4 kWp if there had been the space.
The system was installed in September 2010 so we now have two full calendar years of data on electricity generation, covering 2011 and 2012. Up until the start of 2012 I recorded the meter reading virtually every day but since then I’ve been doing it once per week. The data is recorded manually and then transcribed into an Excel spread sheet (soon I hope to replace that process with an automated system, but more of that in a later post). From the spread sheet I have been able to graphically chart the data – see below (and click to enlarge).
Considered in broad terms the chart shows pretty much what you would expect – low generation in the early part of each year, building up through the summer and dropping again as winter returns. However, looking in more detail it is perhaps surprising just how much the rate of generation varies week by week as well as year by year. It is possible for one week to generate twice as much energy as another week in the same month. Similarly each year can have very different weather, so for example 2011 had generation peaks in April and May, while 2012 had peaks in May, August and September. In fact 2012 was significantly more variable than 2011.
Fortunately over a whole year the peaks and troughs average out pretty well, and the system has performed well. It generated 3650 kWh (3.65 megawatt hours) in 2011 and 3500 kWh (3.5 MWh) in 2012, and these numbers compare very favourably with the 3333 kWh that was predicted. Over these two years it was eligible for FIT payments of £3130 which is about one-fifth of its installation cost (£15750) so it is on course to pay for itself in about 10 years without even counting the cost of the electricity saved.
After it’s paid off the benefits don’t stop, of course – it is eligible to get FIT payments for a further 15 years – index linked – and after that we will have free electricity for life.
Overall it has been a great investment, so much so that we are looking to add another system on the front of the house with a view to using it to power our ZOE – more to follow on that in a future post.
Last weekend the Renault ZOE took part in the Italian ‘25 Ore di Magione Energy Saving Race’ (25 Hour Magione Energy Saving Race) and won both categories in which it competed: ‘utility’ and ‘electric powered vehicle’. The race began at the Autodrome di Magione in Umbria with the first part following the road around Lake Trasimeno, while the night section took place within the autodrome.
The total distance covered was 236km, which the ZOE achieved with two uses of its fast Chameleon charger. It won on criteria that considered the vehicle weight, average speed and distance travelled per kWh, at one point achieving 193.4km on a charge at an average speed of 45km/h.
“Renault ZOE cabriolet: ideal for driving in the fresh spring air! Would you like this concept made by a fan to be real?”
The image is believed to have been produced by the creator of the Spanish Facebook community page Renault Zoe. It has generated a lot of interest and discussion, but there is no suggestion that Renault has any plans to build a ZOE Cabriolet.
The road we are on leads to a climate hotter than any humans have yet endured. Only by cutting carbon emissions can we steer toward a stable climate. Each day that we don’t choose the path of reduced carbon emissions we cut off a possible climate endpoint. And the longer we delay turning down the path carbon-free energy the sharper and more difficult the turn will be.
The past year has seen some impressive debuts on the new car scene, and Diesel Car magazine is very proud to announce the winners of its much coveted and well respected annual Car of the Year Awards 2013. Our award winning writers have put every single new car through its paces, in a stringent test programme, to decide upon the very best cars in ten different segments. From a shortlist of 26 cars, our expert judges have come up with the class winners.
Class: Best Alternative Fuel Car
Electric finalist: RENAULT ZOE
Renault is proving to be quite a champion of electric cars, and the Zoe is its fourth EV and the most convincing one yet.
It is also the most instinctively appealing battery model so far.
With its trim little supermini looks, Clio underpinnings and roomy practicality, the Renault makes a strong case for going electric, with a 130-mile range and a similar price to a diesel Clio to boot.
Any anxiety about battery life longevity is overcome by a lease plan, and Renault will replace the pack for free when efficiency drops below 75 per cent.
Good to drive and blissfully quiet, the Zoe is a peach.
Hybrid finalist: MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS
Driving a hybrid should not be a quirky choice, as you want it to be utterly seamless and entirely unobtrusive, and that is what is so impressive about the E300 BlueTec Hybrid…
During the test drive I had a chance for the first time to try out some of the driver’s controls. First of all there is a display selector, just to the left of the main dashboard TFT display screen. This cycles between three different forms of display – as I recall one that’s primarily a numeric display of speed, energy consumption, mileage and so on; one that’s like a speedometer dial going up and down as electricity is used or generated, and one that has a more artistic display showing lines of energy moving to the right, from battery to car, when accelerating or moving to the left, from car to battery, when regenerative braking.
Next I tried out the cruise control. I believe this is initiated by the button to the left of the gear lever (it was actually done by the salesman) but then I was able to operate it using buttons on the steering wheel. When switched on the vehicle will accelerate or decelerate to the currently set speed; this speed is shown top centre on the driver’s display. The set speed can be adjusted up and down by a centre-biased switch on the left side of the steering wheel – pushing the top half of the switch (marked ‘+’) increases the set speed and pushing the bottom half (marked ‘–’) decreases the set speed.
The cruise control was certainly a novelty to me, perhaps because I’ve never driven a car before that had it. It was mildly disconcerting having it speed up or slow down apparently under its own control, though I can certainly see the attraction and use of such a system, particularly on the motorway. Pressing the accelerator or brake disabled it.
The cruise control can be engaged or disengaged by pressing the centre-biased switch on the right side of the steering wheel – pushing the bottom half of the switch (marked ‘O’) turns it off and pressing the top half (marked ‘R’) re-engages it.
The other button on the right of the steering wheel is to turn on voice-activated commands. I didn’t get a chance to experiment with it beyond pressing it and having the R-Link respond ‘Say voice command’ or something similar.
I certainly had the impression from my test drive that the ZOE is loaded with technology and clever controls, and look forward to experimenting with mine when it arrives.
For my test drive I had the opportunity to take a long drive out of the town and through the local countryside and so I was able to try out the ZOE in a variety of conditions. The experience of starting up is disconcerting, as is often said when someone used to a combustion engine tries an electric vehicle. You put your foot on the brake and then press the Start/Stop button on the dashboard. At that point the dashboard lights up but of course there is no engine noise – to someone used to a combustion engine it lacks the obvious feedback of a revving engine, though I imagine one could get used to it quickly enough.
To move you engage the gear lever (marked P R N D) from park to reverse or drive. Having always driven cars with manual gearboxes I really don’t like this lever. It seems to be to be a simple sop to those used to driving with an automatic gearbox. Since the ZOE has no gearbox I believe it would be far preferable to dispense with a gear lever altogether and have simple selector buttons on the centre console, or even a simple selector lever on the steering wheel like a sports or racing car. Similarly, as soon as you release the brake pedal there is ‘creep’ and the car starts to move – this makes no sense in an electric car and again, I believe, just panders to those used to automatics.
When starting off and moving at slow speeds it would be fair to describe the travel as ‘silent’. While technically not actually silent the quietness is eerie. There is no detectible sound from the electric motor, and the noise from the tyres is little more than you would get from someone walking past.
At slow speeds the brakes are noticeably ‘grabby’ – this was commented on by each driver. This is presumably because at low speed the friction brakes are being used exclusively. This may have been particularly noticeable on our demonstrator vehicle as it had such a low mileage and the friction brakes may not have been bedded in – it’s possible we would have noticed the same effect on a brand new Clio. At highway speeds the brakes are mostly using regeneration and felt fine – very smooth. When decelerating to a stop there is a point at which the brakes necessarily transition from regenerative to friction, but I don’t notice this changeover particularly.
Leaving the dealership and starting on the test drive I found the ZOE very straightforward to drive and I had to agree with my colleagues’ comments – on the whole it is very much like driving a conventional car. In fact, given the wide range of performance and behaviour of cars, it is fair to say that the ZOE sits comfortably within that range and doesn’t stand out in terms of handling, acceleration, steering, braking, etc. for being electric.
I initially found the acceleration acceptable but not remarkable. However I realised fairly quickly that the ZOE was in ‘Eco’ mode (there’s an indicator at the bottom of the driver’s display) and switched this off (the button is to the left of the gear lever). After that I found the acceleration to be satisfyingly lively at low speeds and still perfectly acceptable at higher speeds.
The ride is good but erring towards firm – the ZOE certainly doesn’t glide over potholes or broken road surfaces (of which there seem to be a lot on British roads at the moment) but nor is it excessively jolting. Overall it gave me the impression of having suspension similar to a ‘hot hatch’ of which I’ve driven a few – a sacrifice of a soft ride to provide good handling. And the handling is good, with the ZOE comfortably managing curving and sharp corners at a range of speeds. Only a couple of times did I have the impression that the car was not responding quite as fast to steering inputs as I expected – the feeling that it was ‘heavier than it looks’. That is a largely unavoidable consequence of carrying a heavy battery pack, only partially compensated for by carrying it low and largely under the centre of the vehicle.
As touched on previously the ZOE is not silent at highway speeds – in fact it almost seemed quite noisy even in the absence of the combustion engine, though of course it’s likely that without engine noise all other noises become relatively more obvious. As well as the road noise there is also noticeable sound from the electric motor. It is much less than that of an engine but it is there. Most of the time it is just a background whirr, but under hard acceleration it produces a distinctive whine which can’t be ignored though – one could argue – it does give back to the driver some of the visceral feedback that you get from a hard-revving petrol engine. Most of the time, though, the motor just produces a background noise that is much less invasive than a combustion engine.
At one point while driving through a pedestrianised area I became aware of another sound that I couldn’t place – a bit like a low frequency rumble as though we were passing a busy factory. The salesman pointed it out as being the ZE Voice becoming activated at our slow speed. I wound down the window to listen to it. I can’t comment on its effectiveness at warning pedestrians of our approach, but as a driver I didn’t like it. I can see me turning it off, or at least choosing my own ‘ringtone’ for it (assuming I can do that) – something like a futuristic Stars Wars-style spaceship sound perhaps. Or just a music track, if that’s possible, such as Ride of the Valkyries.