and there is Leaf and an Outlander, the Outlander will be supping at something ridiculous like 3kw, maybe 6kw. And you’ll just have to sit.
It’s no different to a Leaf. The Outlander will use CHAdeMO and get 50kW, or AC and get 7kW. This is better than the Leaf, which most likely gets 3kW! So you’re better off waiting for an Outlander using AC than a Leaf 🙂
Previous Outlander had a 2.4 petrol CVT.
Ah, ofcourse; I forgot about them 🙂
From speaking to few mitsubishi dealers I think these are mainly selling as company cars since they were exempt from company car tax until this tax year.
Yup, this was a company car. He said the company car tax is still a fraction of his colleagues Audis and BMWs! (Which to be fair, if it’s doing 90mpg like he says; that’s more than double the 40mpg my Megane did, and it’s a beast!!).
To me hybrids don’t make sense.
At the simplest level, how on earth can it be efficient to carry about a petrol engine and an electric motor, and have both a petrol tank and a battery.
I always thought the same, but *90mpg*. If an Outlander can do 90mpg, what can a range-extended small car do? For people with concerns about range that won’t buy a BEV, I’d highly recommend a range-extended (or even a traditional hybrid) over a traditional fuel car. Yes, more to go wrong; but the efficiency is way higher than I expected. I’m surprised if you got 80mpg out of a Civic… really starting to wonder if there was something up with my Megane! It was 40mpg on the motorways, and 40mpg to/from work. Never changed :/
Series Hybrid mode activates when the battery charge is low or when battery is deplated.In this mode the engine runs to charge the battery, which provides power to the wheels.
Aha! So he wasn’t completely mistaken then! Looking back at the website, it’s quite clear now; I just didn’t click around enough. This is probably how it gets his 90mpg then; running an engine at constant revs to charge a battery will likely be way more efficient than driving the car. Well spotted 🙂